Wednesday, November 30, 2022
...it will still #1 for graduates convicted of seditious conspiracy! I would love to see Mr. Rhodes's application file!
Tuesday, November 29, 2022
Dean Johnson's statement is here. At this point, the official boycotters are: Yale, Harvard, Columbia, Stanford, Berkeley, Michigan, Georgetown, Duke, Northwestern, UCLA, UC Irvine, and UC Davis. Chicago has declined to join the boycott, and Cornell's status is ambiguous. No word yet from NYU, Virginia, Penn, Texas, Vanderbilt, Southern California et al.
Unless there is a snowballing of boycott announcements this week, I suspect that the net effect on USNews.com's mischief will be minimal.
Monday, November 28, 2022
Thursday, November 24, 2022
My own view is that the rankings distort academic decision-making, fail to adequately capture institutional quality, and create perverse incentives that are not in the best interests of students or the legal profession.
However, withdrawal from the rankings process will not have the desired impact that many assume that it will have. For one, U.S. News has said that it will continue to rank all law schools regardless of their level of participation. In addition, all law schools are already required to report most of the relevant data used in the rankings to the American Bar Association, and this information is publicly available by ABA rule. This includes LSAT, GPA, acceptance rate, yield, number of courses, faculty head count, average financial aid package, bar passage rates, career outcomes, and more. (This transparency regime was part of a laudable ABA effort to provide applicants with the information necessary to make informed decisions about pursuing a legal education.) Even financial reports about expenditures are publicly available in summary budgets that some universities publish online. The reality is that U.S. News & World Report is a journalistic enterprise, and they don’t need anyone’s permission, including mine, to publish a ranking, and they have ready access to information from the ABA and other public sources to construct their rankings.
Whether Cornell Law School ultimately “withdraws” or not from the rankings, what we need is a deeper and more searching conversation about the role that rankings play in law school life, the legal profession, and higher education generally.
Again, I think they're not joining the boycott, but I'm really not sure. Comments are open if any faculty from Cornell want to clarify.
Wednesday, November 23, 2022
The NYT story noted the other day foolishly invoked the nonsense category "top 14" in discussing schools that were declining to cooperate (UCLA's joining the boycott torpedoed that characterization). As UCLA Interim Dean Korobkin correctly noted, 80% of the input data is available to USNews.com without the cooperation of the schools. It will, however, be a lot more work for USNews.com to compile all this data on its own. The loss of "free labor" by the schools won't matter if only 15 or 20 schools are boycotting. If 100 or 150 schools are boycotting, that will be different, and could cause a logistical crisis for USNews.com.
Right now, ten law schools are boycotting. Because the first two--Yale and Harvard--are extremely prominent that has generated a lot of attention. But it will take more than ten to create a problem for USNews.com's annual mischief.
Tuesday, November 22, 2022
Monday, November 21, 2022