Friday, October 23, 2020
The results of the last poll are here, and basically regurgitate US News (or the "halo effect" of school name) with a couple of exceptions. But there was also more mischief this time. As one reader reported (by examining the detailed breakdown of votes):
I’m reaching out because I was looking at the raw balloting data on the website and I noticed something curious. There are 66 voters in your survey who rank UC Davis as one of the top 10 law schools and UC Hastings as one of the bottom 8 law schools. Interestingly, only 5 voters rank UCLA as one of the top 10 law schools and UC Hastings as one of the bottom 8 law schools and only 2 voters rank UC Irvine as one of the top 10 law schools and UC Hastings as one of the bottom 8 law schools. Whoever these pro-Davis, anti-Hastings voters are, they appear to be a large percentage of the respondents and to have a material impact on Hastings’ rank. It is possible my read of the data is incorrect, but this is what jumps out at me once I load your spreadsheet into Stata.
Conversely, no voters rank Hastings in the top 10 and Davis in the bottom 8.
There were other, shall we say, peculiar patterns in the voting. If someone wants to undertake a serious and informed survey about law faculty quality, get in touch, and I'll offer guidance about how to do it. I don't have the time myself, but am happy to be an advisor and to publicize the results.