April 07, 2014

Lawyers, law professors and depression

A bracing series of posts by Charlotte Law's Brian Clarke:  this is the third in the series, with links back to the earlier ones.

Posted by Brian Leiter on April 7, 2014 in Faculty News, Legal Profession | Permalink

April 03, 2014

More signs of the times: 15% cut in tuition sticker price at Brooklyn

Story here.  Whether that will represent an actual cut depends on how much discounting took place in the past, which we don't know.

Posted by Brian Leiter on April 3, 2014 in Legal Profession, Of Academic Interest | Permalink

April 02, 2014

The law clerk hiring process: an interview with Judge Ambro of the 3rd Circuit

Here.

Posted by Brian Leiter on April 2, 2014 in Legal Profession, Professional Advice, Student Advice | Permalink

March 25, 2014

Dean Rodriguez (Northwestern) on hysteria about law schools

He is obviously right.  What is worse, in this instance, is that the "story" about Denver is complete fiction, but since "Above the Law" has no regard for facts, it's hardly surprising they would report such fiction as though it were factual.

Posted by Brian Leiter on March 25, 2014 in Legal Profession, Of Academic Interest | Permalink

March 21, 2014

More signs of the times

Appalachian cutting faculty.  In addition, I recently spoke to a colleague at another law school--a strong, regional school but with a faculty with a national scholarly reputation--who reported the teaching load has been raised from 10 hours per year per faculty member to 12 hours.  Twenty years ago, 12 hours was the norm at most law schools, except for the very top ones.  Over the last twenty years, 10 hours/3 courses became increasingly common.  For a school of this caliber to make the move back to 12 suggests that other schools are following or will soon follow suit.

Posted by Brian Leiter on March 21, 2014 in Faculty News, Legal Profession, Of Academic Interest | Permalink

March 20, 2014

Falsehood of the day: "U.S. News, for all of its faults, is how employers think of you"

Elie Mystal, one of the bloggers at "Above the Law," wrote this last week (a reader forwarded it to me).  No evidence was offered, and that's not surprising:  the statement is false in almost all cases.  Employers, to be sure, have views about different law schools, but they are based on experience, in some cases, experience that stretches over decades.  Actual lawyers and judges do not, in my experience, pay any attention to U.S. News at all.  A couple of years ago, for example, I was speaking to a distinguished group of Northwestern University Law School alumni about the U.S. News rankings.  There were about 125 to 150 lawyers (and a few judges) there.  Many of the lawyers in attendance had been or were the current hiring partners at their firms.  I asked a simple question:  how many had looked at the recent U.S. news rankings of law schools?  Maybe five hands went up in the entire room.  To a person, all these lawyers and judges said they based their evaluations of law schools--where they recruit, how deep into the class they will go for new hires--on their past experience with the schools and their graduates.  Full stop.  No one was waiting for the U.S. News law school rankings to decide where to interview or whom to hire.

So if lawyers and judges don't care about them, who does care about the U.S. News rankings?  Prospective students and journalists.  Prospective students are very clearly influenced by them, in part because journalists hype them and report on them irresponsibily.  And because of those two constituencies, law schools have to care as well:  if, in fact, the students a school wants will go elsewhere because of a precipitous drop in the US News ranking, this will over a period of time affect how the employers that hire frm that school perceive it, not because they follow U.S. News, but because they will notice the change in the caliber of the student body.

Posted by Brian Leiter on March 20, 2014 in Legal Profession, Of Academic Interest, Rankings | Permalink

March 17, 2014

ABA votes to retain tenure (good) and require 6 hours of experiential learning of ALL students (bad)

Blog Emperor Caron has the details.  Fortunately, the insane proposal for 15 hours of so-called "experiential" learning was defeated.

ADDENDUM:  As a couple of readers noted, I have in the past expressed the view that tenure need not be an accreditation requirement, which is still my view.  But given some of the administrative mischief afoot, and some of the reasons given for opposing tenure, I am happy to see the ABA leave it alone for now.

Posted by Brian Leiter on March 17, 2014 in Legal Profession, Of Academic Interest | Permalink

February LSAT takers up very slightly from last year

A bit more than 1%.  A first indication that applications and enrollments may be about to level off in the next year or so.

Posted by Brian Leiter on March 17, 2014 in Legal Profession, Of Academic Interest | Permalink

March 06, 2014

Scrutinizing the data about the legal job market

Facts are never welcome by cyber-miscreants, but sometimes they are worth considering by those hoping to make informed decisions.

Posted by Brian Leiter on March 6, 2014 in Legal Profession, Of Academic Interest, Student Advice | Permalink

March 05, 2014

More signs of the time: declining 1L enrollments

Blog Emperor Caron has the sordid details.  Not all declines are created equal:  some are due to dramatic drops in applicants, but some are surely due to a desire to preserve the numerical quality of the study body and thus rankings.  The schools with increases in enrollment, also noted, are interesting.

Posted by Brian Leiter on March 5, 2014 in Legal Profession, Of Academic Interest, Rankings | Permalink