March 18, 2011

"National Jurist": I am one of 23 Law Profs "to take before you die"

Ascertained via a robust scientific method.  No Bainbridge or Kerr, who are also leading authories in their areas, as well as bloggers?  Curious indeed.

UPDATE:  Reader Jason Walta may have solved the mystery:  "I think the only discernible guiding principle for inclusion on the list was 'Here Is A Person You'll Recognize From the Internet!'"  That certainly might explain some of the the inclusions, but doesn't explain the omissions of the folks noted above.  I guess we'll just never get to the bottom of this.


March 18, 2011 in Legal Humor, Legal Profession, Of Academic Interest | Permalink | TrackBack (0)

March 10, 2011

U.S. News Rankings Fraud (or Joke?) Watch

It's hard to believe they did this, but they didU.S. News got 105 lawyers throughout the entire United States to rank the law schools they like to recruit from, and then posted it as a "ranking."  Yes, 105, that's it.  No information on where these 105 went to school, or where they work.  Maybe it is just meant as a joke, that could be.  Or maybe it's meant to burnish the image, by contrast, of the main fraud on the consumers of legal education for which U.S. News is known, and which is due out next week.


March 10, 2011 in Legal Humor, Rankings | Permalink | TrackBack (0)

January 21, 2011

Breaking News: Right-Wing Crazies Do *Not* Like Liberal Ideas (from law schools or anywhere else)

Who would have guessed?

(For the record, I'm sure I think Mr. Olson is as "crazy" as he really believes liberal social politices have been "catastrophic" for society.  Hyperbole loves company!)


January 21, 2011 in Legal Humor, Of Academic Interest | Permalink | TrackBack (0)

January 08, 2011

The divorce case from hell

But a Canadian family court judge has some fun with an ugly situation:  see esp. paragraphs 1-2, 9-24, 44-50, 70-93, 117, 137, 158, 210-213 of the opinion, and do read the footnotes, some of which are laugh-out-loud funny.  Paragraph 213 of the opinion explains the judge's approach.  Somehow I suspect the legal system is not done with this tragically dysfunctional family situation.


January 8, 2011 in Legal Humor, Of Academic Interest | Permalink | TrackBack (0)

January 04, 2011

In Praise of TSA's New Security Procedures: A great way to "jumpstart a holiday"!

An old friend who is an attorney in New York writes:

I recently visited your Law School Reports page and I am writing to voice my disagreement with your stance on airport pat downs.  For me and many other Americans, they are not an unreasonable search, but an occasional thrill that can really jumpstart a holiday.  To know you have the option of being viewed naked under a scanner or fondled by a government employee is something I find easy to accept, and see no words in the Constitution that prohibit such activities. 

Now it's true there's a Fourth Amendment in the Constitution, but it doesn't say anything about unreasonable fondling.


January 4, 2011 in Legal Humor | Permalink | TrackBack (0)

December 17, 2010

Breaking news: David Bernstein (George Mason) Accuses *Other* Legal Academics...

...of "consciously or not, [trying] to justify their preferred political outcomes"  under the guise of disinterested scholarship. 

No comment.  (OK, one comment.  And do follow this exchange.)

(Thanks to Peter A. for the link.)


December 17, 2010 in Legal Humor | Permalink | TrackBack (0)

November 22, 2010

Solove on New TSA Airport Screening Procedures

This is easily the funniest thing I've seen on a law blog in years! 


November 22, 2010 in Legal Humor, Of Academic Interest | Permalink | TrackBack (0)

November 17, 2010

How to Get Dean Search Committees to Stop Calling You to Ask If You're Interested

I thought I'd found the solution a few years ago, by having a blog, in which I speak plainly and honestly (which Deans are forbidden from doing) and in which I expressed political opinions so far out of the mainstream in the reactionary United States as to make all but the most progressive schools nervous.  This worked for awhile, though I've started getting the calls and inquiries again.   But now Brian Tamanaha (Wash U/St. Louis) has discovered the best way to guarantee one will never be sought after as a Dean:  make clear what you would do if you were Dean! 


November 17, 2010 in Legal Humor, Legal Profession, Of Academic Interest, Professional Advice, Rankings | Permalink | TrackBack (0)

October 20, 2010

"So you want to go to law school"

"Cynical" barely does justice to this, but it is funny.

(Thanks to Michael Sevel for the pointer.)


October 20, 2010 in Legal Humor, Legal Profession | Permalink | TrackBack (0)

July 29, 2010

"Volokh Conspiracy" Blog Implodes: Kerr v. Lindgren

Lindgren is not winning.  In the great teapot that is the blogosphere, this tempest is particularly amusing:  here, here, here, here.

(Thanks to several different readers for flagging this curiuos back-and-forth.  Professor Lindgren appears never to have met a non-story or triviality about which he couldn't blog.)


July 29, 2010 in Law Professors Saying Dumb Things, Legal Humor, Of Academic Interest | Permalink | TrackBack (0)