Several readers have written to alert me to the fact that apparently even Paul Campos has realized that his blog didn't have much content, apart from insulting and deriding Deans, faculty and anyone else who contested his claims. But, true to form, he can't say goodbye without just making things up out of whole cloth. He writes:
I started [the blog] because I had something to say, and this seemed a good way of saying it. For a few days I wrote anonymously – something I had never done before – more as a stylistic experiment than anything else. But naturally people in legal academia instantly became more concerned with Who Was Saying These Outrageous Things than in whether those things might actually be true.
In fact, it was Campos himself who made a big deal out of "who was saying these things": namely, as prominently advertised on his blog at the start, "a tenured law professor at a Tier 1 law school". He made a big deal out of that because it was meant to lend his claims, including his false ones, credibility, and thus
it was precisely he who made his identity the issue. The fact that
his initial posts, deriding allegedly lazy law faculty who produce lousy scholarship--a transparent case of projection,
as I noted at the start, and which accounted for the hostile response he got--were false, inflammatory and, at best, misleading is what annoyed even those who didn't know Campos and his history of trying to garner media attention by any means possible.
But true to form, Campos now declares that "the core message" of his blog was diferent, namely,
that legal academia is operating on the basis of an unsustainable economic model, which requires most law students to borrow more money to get law degrees than it makes sense for them to borrow, given their career prospects, and that for many years law schools worked hard, wittingly or unwittingly, to hide this increasingly inconvenient truth from both themselves and their potential matriculants.
But, of course,
that message (the bit in bold)--which was Brian Tamanaha's and Bill Henderson's, and was
widely covered and
discussed on this
blog long before Campos ever came to it (though in all three cases with more nuance and accuracy than Campos ever mustered)--was a late arrival for Campos, and even when he got to it, he still
muddied it with smears and insults of prospective students and professional colleagues. (He even
interfered with the operations of his own school, quite remarkably, and went so far as to exploit
a student's suicide.) The facts about the cost of legal education and the state of the job market are now widely known thanks to David Segal's
New York Times series in 2011-12 which, notwithstanding,
a lot of inaccuracies, made the debacle of the legal job market common knowledge, and Senators Coburn and Boxer
pressuring the ABA to force law schools to report job statistics more accurately. Sometimes Campos managed to stay on that message, once he discovered it, but much of the time he spent insulting and deriding Deans and law school administrators as sociopaths, conmen, and liars.
Recent Comments