« Why did most legal scholars, liberal and conservative, fail to realize that the Supreme Court might take the silly arguments against the "individual mandate" seriously? | Main | Law School Applications Down about 16% for the Year »

April 09, 2012

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c659b53ef0153938301ba970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Faculty Lists for "Empirical Legal Studies":

Comments

Alec Stone Sweet

Interesting - I work in the area. A Stone Sweet, Yale
http://works.bepress.com/alec_stone_sweet/

Scott Altman


For USC, you might add Nancy Staudt, Ehud Kamar, and Ed McCaffery.

Paul H Edelman

You've missed a number of people at Vanderbilt: Randall Thomas, Nancy King, Erin O'Hara O'Connor, Paige Skiba, and me (Paul Edelman).

frankcross

Gotta add John de Figuereido to Duke

Lisa Bressman

For Vanderbilt, you might include (in addition to those mentioned by Paul Edelman): Margaret Blair, Ed Cheng, and Mike Vandenbergh.

Matt

I'm not 100% sure what counts as "empirical" legal studies, but for Penn, it's plausible to add Paul Robinson, who does significant work involving surveys (and other methods) testing people's "intuitions of justices" (often with collaborators), and perhaps Stephen Morse, for his work on psychology and the law (in particular neuroscience) though I'm less sure about whether the later should be included.

Reuel Schiller

UC Hastings has a bunch of young scholars who work in this area: Hadar Aviram, Dorit Rubenstein Reiss, and Jodi Short (who will be joining us next year from Georgetown), Osagie Obasagie, and Ben Depoorter. Each of these folks works at the intersction of the social sciences and the law. Some of our more senior folks also work in this area: Joan Williams, David Faigman, and Clark Freshman, for example.

Suzanna Sherry

Another missing Vanderbilt empiricist: Brian Fitzpatrick. (See An Empirical Study of Class Action Settlements and Their Fee Awards, 7 J Empirical Leg Stud 811 (2010.)

Laura Rosenbury

Washington University: Andrew Martin, Pauline Kim, Adam Badawi, David Law, Rebecca Hollander-Blumoff, Scott Baker, *Jim Spriggs, Peter Wiedenbeck

BL COMMENT: Thanks, Wash U shoulld clearly be on the list.

Rob

Like Matt, I'm not sure what ELS, except as a movement, means. Why isn't "Quantitative Legal Analysis" more accurate? Surely most historians are involved in empirical legal studies, but I don't see anyone including them.

BL COMMENT: Many of the psychologists and even some of the political scientists aren't doing quantiative work. I don't know of anyone who thinks history is part of "empirical legal studies," so whatever the fuzzy borders of the category, it doesn't include scholars whose primary work is historical.

Scott Altman

Also for USC, you can add (joint law and business) Mark Weinstein and John Matsusaka.

Kate Litvak

For Northwestern, add: Key Ayotte, Ron Allen, and Eugene Kontorovich. Also, your list includes people who are not themselves empiricists, but have co-authored an empirical paper or two with an empiricist. With that definition, Northwestern's list of empiricists will further expand.

BL COMMENT: I am inclined to think the lists should not include co-authors, who do not themselves have any relevant empirical skills. But I'm happy to be convinced otherwise.

Margaret Jane Radin

For Michigan, you might add: Jim Hines, Veronica Santarosa, Sonja Starr, and Laura Beny

JJ Prescott

Also to add for Michigan:

Margo Schlanger
John DiNardo (joint appointment)
Phoebe Ellsworth
Michael Barr

Ken Bamberger

Berkeley's list should also include: Lauren Edelman, Calvin Morrill, Catherine (KT) Albiston and Victoria Plaut, empiricists trained in sociology, anthropology and psychology.

Ken Bamberger

. . . and also for Berkeley, Robert Bartlett.

Larry Kramer

Given some of the folks you've included at other school, for Stanford, faculty members whose work is largely or entirely empirical also include: Rob Daines, Mark Kelman, Dan Kessler, Mike Klausner, Mark Lemley, Jeff Strnad, George Triantis.

Richard Hynes

For Virginia, you should add George Geis, Jason Johnston and John Morley. In addition, it is "Hynes", not "Hyndes"

Josh Wright

George Mason: Bruce Kobayashi, Bruce Johnsen, Tom Hazlett, Kevin McCabe, Terrence Chorvat, Henry Butler, Elina Treyger, *Thomas Strattman, Josh Wright

BL COMMENT: Thanks, Josh, I'll certainly add GMU.

Jennifer Laurin

Texas's list should also include the following folks: *Jeffrey Abramson, Mira Ganor, John Golden, Tom McGarity, Bill Sage, James Spindler, Matt Spitzer,and Wendy Wagner.

BL COMMENT: Jeffrey Abramson is not an empirical scholar. Some of the others are arguable, but I am getting worried that the lists are getting padded in meaningless ways (and not just in this case). Am I wrong?

Rex Bossert

UC Irvine School of Law: Olufunmilayo Arewa, Elizabeth Loftus, Katherine Porter, Shauhin Talesh, Christopher Whytock

Jennifer Arlen

Please add the following to the NYU list
Vicki Been
Marcel Kahan
Lewis Kornhauser (assuming experimental empirical analysis counts)
Oren Bar-Gill (same)
Barton Beebe
Adam Cox
Richard Revesz

Lauren B. Edelman, Associate Dean for Jurisprudence and Social Policy

The Berkeley Jurisprudence and Social Policy Program, which is a PhD Program that is part of Berkeley Law, includes many empirical legal scholars trained in the disciplines. In addition to those you mention (Robert MacCoun, Justin McCrary, Kevin Quinn, Dan Rubinfeld, Jonathan Simon, and Frank Zimring), and those added by Ken Bamberger (Lauren Edelman, Calvin Morrill, Catherine Albiston, and Victoria Plaut), JSP empirical scholars include Taeku Lee, and a number of qualitative empirical legal scholars: Kristin Luker, Malcolm Feeley, David Lieberman, Karen Tani, Harry Scheiber). Also, other non-JSP Berkeley law faculty who do empirical work are Robert Bartlett, Eric Biber, and David Sklansky.

Anita Bernstein

This thread has devolved into what, in hindsight, anyone could have predicted: Vague criteria for inclusion & no criteria for exclusion + law professors' enthusiasm for rankings & Top Ten competitions + inviting readers to nominate their own schools = padding. Which I gather BL acknowledged this morning.

Just as a point of methodology, wouldn't it make more sense to draw up a list of empiricists--using some relatively solid definition of the word like the one Brian's anonymous informant mentioned--and then, if we really want to, consider whether certain schools appear prominent?

BL COMMENT: I doubt there is an uncontroversial definition, and in the past this method has worked well. But it just goes to show that either ELS is a flaky 'field' or ELS is so prestigious that everyone wnats to be counted in it!

J.J. Prescott

For Michigan, please also add Jill Horwitz...

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Advertisements :


Blog powered by TypePad