This is bound to be widely discussed. Thoughts from professional responsibility scholars? Comments must be signed, full name and valid e-mail address.

« Couch Named Dean at Oklahoma City | Main | ABA Adopts New Rules on Jobs Reporting by Law Schools »
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c659b53ef015437e22393970c
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Katherine Franke (Columbia) on Occupy Wall Street...and Lawyers:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Many of the same views are expressed here:
http://www.californialawreview.org/articles/professionalism-and-power-flawed-decision-making-by-the-olc-exposes-a-bar-that-is-losing-its-moxie
Posted by: J. Lavitt | December 06, 2011 at 10:55 AM
I agree entirely with Prof. Franke that the role of lawyers in the financial crisis has not received sufficient attention. However, while individual cases may vary depending on the precise transaction and the knowledge of the relevant actors, credit default swaps and shorts of sub-prime mortgage assets are not illegal, and I do not see why even a public-minded attorney should have refused to assist clients in carrying out these types of transactions.
In my view, the problem is not that attorneys who represented financial industry clients were overzealous or insufficiently public-minded. It is that they simply did not care to know 1) Whether the institutions originating mortgages were following proper underwriting guidelines and 2)whether mortgage-backed securities might fall in value. Failing to carry out due diligence may constitute a violation of competence rules - and I expect to see some litigation against lawyers who represented issuers and investors in some of these transactions - but mere participation in the creation or acquisition of exotic financial products is not ethically problematic.
Posted by: Milan Markovic | December 06, 2011 at 01:28 PM
It is great to see interest building in this subject. At the Cornell Law School, we organized a conference two years ago aimed at initiating just this conversation among legal professionals in the financial markets--about what they could do, from the inside, to "stabilize the markets and change the world," as we put it, somewhat tongue in cheek. Information about this initiative is here.
http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/international/conferences/TechniquesOfHope/Conference-Summary.cfm
We are in the process of putting together a little book on the subject aimed at financial lawyers. But if anyone is interested in building on this initiative or collaborating in any way, please let me know.
Annelise Riles
Posted by: Annelise Riles | December 16, 2011 at 04:44 PM