This still seems to me basically right, though I think the continued rise in importance of faculty-edited journals has blunted some of the bad effects of blogs.
Advertisements:
Advertising Opportunities
General Information
- Brian Leiter - personal homepage
Personal homepage with CV and information about books and teaching, and links to on-line papers and audio and video recordings - Brian Leiter | University of Chicago - Academia.edu (with CV)
- Advertising Opportunities on this Blog
- Comments Policy
- Brian Leiter - Naymz
- Brian Leiter, Karl N. Llewellyn Professor of Jurisprudence and Director, Center for Law, Philosophy, and Human Values
Recommended Law Blogs
Search
Copyright Notice
- © All materials from 2005 to the present are copyrighted by Brian Leiter. All rights are reserved.
« Legomsky to USCIS | Main | In Memoriam: Derrick Bell »
October 06, 2011
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c659b53ef015435e8f35c970c
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference "Why Blogs are Bad for Legal Scholarship," Redux:
Advertisements :
Recent Posts
- In Memoriam: Daniel Schaffer
- Geu Named Dean of South Dakota
- Lateral hires with tenure, 2012-13
- "Why Tolerate Religion?" at the Center for Inquiry in Washington, DC
- In Memoriam: Richard Coulson
- Congratulations to the Chicago Alumni (and Bigelows and other Fellows) Who Accepted Tenure-Track Teaching Positions during 2012-13
- Trasviña Named Dean of USF
- Brooks from Yale to Columbia
- Mother's day thoughts
- Corporate Practice Commentator's "Top 10" Articles for 2012
Recent Comments