« Some Realism about the U.S. Supreme Court | Main | USC's Dudziak Wins ACLS Fellowship »

July 25, 2006

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c659b53ef00d8346a7c3469e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Alito Clerks for 2006 Term?:

Comments

Anonymous

Matthew Schwartz (Columbia '03) is one of the OT06 Alitonyaks. Schwartz clerked for Alito on the Third Circuit in '03-'04. The other is Gordon Todd (UVA '00).
Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_law_clerks_of_the_Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States

anon

Not that it matters much, but I noticed that the clerks Roberts brought with him to the court are not being counted. Do the numbers reflect that rule generally? For example, Scalia hired four of his own initially. Alito has just done the same.

another anon

Prof. Leiter explained in a previous post that those clerks were not counted because they had actually been Roberts's clerks the very year before, and they accompanied him directly to the SC, presumably because he didn't have time to re-select from the larger pool of SC applicants. This is contrary to Alito, who may have chosen a bunch of previous hires, but re-selected them after a deliberative process and from the entire constellation of applicants. (I don't know when Scalia ascended to the SC, so who knows whether he took his then-clerks directly with him or, on the contrary, if, even if he had hired them at some previous point, he re-selected them out of the larger pool after time to deliberate.)

Since the purpose of Prof. Leiter's data is to gauge the strength of schools' SC clerkship records in the broader applicant pool, it makes sense to include only those who were selected from that broader pool. Thus even if a clerk was re-selected, like Alito's clerks, they would count, since they were re-selected from the broader pool after time for deliberation -- deliberation that presumably took into account their respective schools, the pertinent statistic.

Sean

Gordon Todd? Interesting, given this snippet from a Boston Globe article during Alito's confirmation process: ((http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2005/11/17/alito_disagreed_with_court_decisions_on_reapportionment/)

"Gordon Todd, a Justice Department lawyer who is working on the Alito nomination, cautioned against reading too much into a line in Alito's application for a post as deputy assistant attorney general.

"He doesn't say in here, 'I disagree with one person, one vote,' " Todd said, adding that only the word ''reapportionment" is used...."

Any thoughts on the appearance of selecting a clerk from the ranks of the Justice Department?


Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Advertisements :


Blog powered by TypePad